Skip to content
PROGRAMME BRIEFING · SAINT-JOACHIM-DE-SHEFFORDSaint-Joachim-de-Shefford

A new route.Know the details.

The Gold Card is a programme with published terms, and reading them is the whole of the preparation. As set out officially, an applicant pays a nonrefundable processing fee of US$15,000 per person, submits to vetting, and only after that vetting makes a gift to the U.S. government: US$1,000,000 where an individual applies, or US$2,000,000 where a corporate sponsor makes the gift on someone's behalf. Each accompanying spouse and each unmarried child under twenty-one adds a further processing fee and a further US$1,000,000 gift. The route operates through existing employment-based immigrant classifications in the first and second preferences rather than creating a new visa category, so the underlying eligibility rules still apply. It is not an investment programme and has nothing in common with EB-5 beyond both involving large sums. Terms have changed since announcement and should be re-verified on the official page before any payment is made.

Talk about GOLD CARD
Official individual contributionUS$1 million
DHS processing feeUS$15,000
Review date7 September 2026

IN THIS GUIDE · What the official programme actually asks for, in what order, and what none of it can be confused with

Start with the GOLD CARD eligibility and application overview

01

A gift is not an investment

The single most common misunderstanding is worth stating flatly. Money given to the U.S. government under this programme is a gift. It buys no share, earns nothing, and is not returned. Nobody receives units, interest or a payout, and there is no exit. That is a different thing from EB-5, where capital is placed into a commercial enterprise, remains the investor's, is exposed to loss, and may eventually be recovered or lost depending on how the business performs. Confusing the two leads people to ask what the Gold Card pays, which has no answer, or to assume the gift can be unwound if plans change, which it cannot. Anyone presenting the programme as a financial product is describing something that does not exist.

02

The classification underneath still has to work

Hypothetical example: Constance is a semi-retired technical publications writer near Saint-Joachim-de-Shefford whose sons live in the United States, and she assumes the fee and the gift are the entire test. They are not. The programme runs through the existing first and second employment-based preferences, so the ordinary requirements of whichever classification applies remain in place alongside the payment and the vetting. That is a substantive gate, not a formality, and it is the right question to put to counsel before any money is committed. It also means the usual grounds of inadmissibility apply, which is a separate matter from vetting and can turn on facts decades old. Answering both questions first costs a consultation; answering them second can cost a nonrefundable fee.

03

Read the official page on the day, not the summary

This programme has been described publicly in several versions since it was announced, and figures, sequence and eligibility have moved. A summary written by an intermediary is not the terms, and neither is a screenshot forwarded in a message. Take them from the official programme site and the presidential action behind it, and check the date. Nobody legitimate needs a payment sent to a private account, an agent or a facilitation service in order to secure a place, and pressure to act before a deadline nobody can point to is a reason to stop rather than hurry. Constance's position is ordinary: she has time, and the cost of a week spent verifying is nothing against the cost of a fee that does not come back.

SOURCES FOR THIS GUIDE

Sources reviewed 2026-09-07. This guide covers a preparation focus; it is not an individual eligibility assessment.

GOLD CARD · SAINT-JOACHIM-DE-SHEFFORD

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.