TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
Enquiries that reach us from Saint-Alphonse-de-Granby almost always name a category first and describe the situation afterwards. Reversing that order is more useful, because each American route puts a different subject under examination. TN looks at a person and at the job that person has been offered. L-1 looks at two companies and at the applicant's own last three years. E-2 looks at money, ownership and control. EB-5 looks at money and at the jobs it is supposed to create. The Gold Card framework looks at an applicant through vetting and a payment. Identifying which subject is on trial tells you immediately which records are going to decide the result, and which ones nobody will ever ask for.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
An occupational therapist employed by a rehabilitation service, a general manager whose employer has just acquired a facility across the border, and somebody who would rather own an American business than work for one are asking three unrelated questions, and the answers borrow very little from one another. Reading the six route pages against each other is the quickest way to see which facts a category studies closely and which it disregards completely, so that a first conversation with an adviser can be about records that exist or do not exist rather than about which acronym sounds most encouraging.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
Two findings decide this route, and an employer's wording controls the second of them, so read the duties before you read the salary.

Two kinds of enquiry dominate locally. The first comes from people whose value is professional or technical: clinical and rehabilitation staff, laboratory technologists, and the designers and technologists employed by the small manufacturers that supply farms, clinics and residences in this part of the Haute-Yamaska. Their question is settled by citizenship, by whether the occupation appears on a specific treaty list, and by what the American job genuinely consists of. The second comes from owner-operators who already run something here and are weighing whether to buy, build or transfer into an American market. Theirs is settled by ownership share, by capital genuinely at risk, and by who directs the enterprise day to day.
Meet the people in your corner
Personal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
Write one sentence saying what is actually in question: your own qualifications, the relationship between two corporations, the origin of a sum of money, or the eligibility of everyone travelling. Almost every wasted month begins with a household preparing evidence about a subject nobody was going to examine.
Employment routes make two findings, never one. Your degree, licence or years of service answer the first. The duties written into the American offer answer the second. Qualified people are refused all the time because the position they were offered is not the thing their qualification describes.
Ownership routes are decided on where funds came from and whether they can still come back. Start at the account that would receive the capital and work back through every transfer, sale and loan until you reach an original event you can document. Stop where the paper stops; that gap is the file's real weakness.
A remote discussion works best when it is aimed at what is unresolved: a duty description nobody can classify, a year abroad that may have been interrupted, a payment nobody can trace. It should finish as a short list of records to obtain and steps to take in order.
Every route page and every guide here works through a different situation — a therapist whose state licence has to exist before the profession requirement is even reached, a manager whose qualifying year abroad was broken by a secondment, a buyer whose purchase price is almost entirely a book of service contracts — so that identical federal rules can be watched operating on unlike facts. Federal immigration law does not vary from one Canadian municipality to another. What varies is which of its conditions a particular file cannot yet satisfy, and finding that condition early is most of the work.
Find your pathwayShneur Herman, Jo Kubti and Alexander Paton answer questions from this municipality remotely, and only remotely. No office exists here or in any neighbouring community, and no in-person appointment is offered for this area at all. An opening discussion is spent separating established facts from assumptions and listing what is still missing. Any formal filing is conducted by a licensed United States immigration attorney, who assumes responsibility for it. Everything published on this site is general information about federal requirements rather than legal advice.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
It does not travel by itself. Where a listed profession is defined by licensure, the licence that matters is the one issued by the American state where the work will happen, and obtaining it is a separate process with its own timetable, examinations and verification steps. A Quebec permit is usually part of the evidence supporting a state application, and it may satisfy the profession's own credential rule, but it is not a substitute for state authority to practise.
Not on its own. An intracompany transfer needs a qualifying relationship between the two entities that corporate records can actually demonstrate, both entities doing business, and one continuous year of qualifying employment abroad within the three years before the petition. Common ownership by the same individuals can create an affiliate relationship, but it has to be shown in share registers rather than described in conversation, and your own duties must then be managerial, executive, or built on specialized knowledge of the company's own processes.
Two of them turn on nationality. TN reaches only citizens of Canada or Mexico, so permanent residence never opens it, however long it has been held. E-2 requires treaty nationality, which for a Canadian permanent resident means the country of their own citizenship must have a qualifying treaty. Intracompany transfer and the investor immigrant route are indifferent to nationality, so they remain available on exactly the same terms as they would be for a citizen.
No. This area is served remotely only. There is no office in the municipality, none in the surrounding region and no in-person appointment of any kind, and consultations happen by remote conversation. The people who answer are Shneur Herman, Jo Kubti and Alexander Paton, working from wherever they are rather than from any premises here, with a licensed United States immigration attorney engaged separately once a filing arises.
Editorial source review: 2026-09-07.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.