Skip to content
PROGRAMME BRIEFING · ROXTON PONDRoxton Pond

A new route.Know the details.

Hypothetical example: a family-owned manufacturer of sawmill and planing-mill machinery near Roxton Pond asks whether it can sponsor its founder under the Gold Card framework at the corporate level, and whether doing so would let the company treat the money as an investment in its United States expansion. The answer to the second half is no, and understanding why explains most of the framework. The payment is a gift made by the applicant, or by a corporate sponsor on the applicant’s behalf, to the U.S. government. It buys no asset, produces no equity and creates no business the family owns. Separately from that gift there is a processing fee of US$15,000 per person, which is not refundable and is not credited against the gift. Vetting comes before the gift is made. The framework uses EB-1 or EB-2 immigrant classifications, and the official executive order directs the agencies to treat the gift as evidence under specified provisions of those classifications. The official FAQ also states that an applicant must be eligible for lawful permanent residence, admissible to the United States, and have an available visa. Because the programme is recent and its terms have been published and revised, every figure and step below should be re-verified against the official programme materials before anybody moves money.

Talk about GOLD CARD
Official individual contributionUS$1 million
DHS processing feeUS$15,000
Review date7 September 2026

IN THIS GUIDE · A gift to the U.S. government and a processing fee are two different payments

Start with the GOLD CARD eligibility and application overview

01

What the framework actually asks for

There are two payments and they behave differently. The first is a processing fee of US$15,000 per person, nonrefundable, paid to begin the process. The second, after vetting, is a gift to the U.S. government: US$1 million where an individual applies, or US$2 million where a corporate sponsor makes the payment for the applicant. Each accompanying spouse and each unmarried child under twenty-one adds a further processing fee and a further US$1 million gift. The direction of the money is worth stating plainly because it is routinely misdescribed: the applicant pays the government, and no government pays the applicant anything.

02

It runs through classifications that already exist

The framework does not create a new standalone visa classification. The official FAQ says that, as appropriately determined by the agencies and subject to availability, a successful applicant receives lawful permanent resident status as an EB-1 or EB-2 visa holder. Executive Order 14351 directs the agencies to treat the qualifying gift as evidence under specified EB-1 and EB-2 provisions. Applicants must still be eligible for lawful permanent residence, admissible to the United States, have a visa available, and submit the Form I-140G and supporting documents requested by USCIS. The gift therefore neither guarantees approval nor becomes legally irrelevant once it is paid.

03

Never analyse it as though it were EB-5

The two are unrelated in structure and it is worth keeping them apart deliberately. EB-5 requires capital placed at risk in a new commercial enterprise, at least ten qualifying full-time jobs, engagement in management or policy formulation, and a later petition to remove conditions. The Gold Card gift is none of those things: it is not at risk because it is not invested, it creates no job obligation, and it leaves the applicant owning nothing. That also means it offers no business upside and no possibility of return. Confirm the current terms on the official programme materials on the day, since a framework this new can change between one conversation and the next.

SOURCES FOR THIS GUIDE

Sources reviewed 2026-09-07. This guide covers a preparation focus; it is not an individual eligibility assessment.

GOLD CARD · ROXTON POND

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.